| News | |
 |
Latest |
|
Archive |
|
Community news |
| Articles | |
|
C++ |
|
Communities and Content |
|
Databases |
|
Editorials |
|
Emacs |
|
General |
|
HTML |
|
Java |
|
Notices |
|
PHP |
|
XML |
| Links | |
|
Apache |
|
C++ |
|
Database |
|
General |
|
HTML |
|
Java |
|
Javascript |
|
Linux |
|
Object oriented programming |
|
Open source |
|
Perl |
|
PHP |
|
Python |
|
Ruby |
|
SOAP |
|
XML |
|
Suggest a link |
| About | |
|
Advertise on zez |
|
Contribute |
|
Contact us |
|
About zez |
RE: Forte for Java |
Categories
Java
Code
Topic:
RE: Forte for Java|
Author: Hasani Hunter |
Time: 02.12.2000 19:31 |
Text:
|
> Have you heard about "SUN Forte for Java"?
> How is this compared to MS Visual Java or Borland Java Builder? > I found this on the SUN site http://www.sun.com/forte/ffj/ce/ and it seems alright but have anyone heard anything about it or tried it? > > O have never used MS Visual Java or Borland Java Builder, but I have used Forte. It seemed like a decent IDE, but it was extremely resource hungry. I think it was written entirely in Java. I was using it on a 450 mghz/128 MB RAM computer and it was way too sluggish for my tastes. > > -- > Danny Dorris I think Danny is right. Forte is a resource hog at best. I have a more biased opinion as I do not use IDE's for that reason, besides, sometimes you are not given the control you need over your program's structure. The nice thing about Forte is that you are using pure java classes unlike products like visual age. |
Message threads
| Topic: | Author: | Time: |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Forte for Java | Frank Olav Karlsen | 14.11.2000 16:48 | |
| RE: Forte for Java | Danny Dorris | 15.11.2000 03:48 | |
| RE: Forte for Java | Hasani Hunter | 02.12.2000 19:31 |
